Obama Deeply Concerned After Syrians Gassed To Death On White House Lawn

 

Link - Headline: Obama Deeply Concerned After Syrians Gassed To Death On White House Lawn

British Intelligence says Syria's Assad used gas weapons 14 times after Obama's Red Line warning last year.

 Link - summary by CNN of British Intelligence Report Syrian Gas Attacks

On her watch as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton said “This is a red line for the United States, I'm not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people. But suffice to say we are certainly planning to take action,” she warned.
Link - Clinton's repeat of the Red Line warning

Yeah, sure .... As Secretary of State with State's own intelligence services and plugged into the rest of the US intelligence network, Clinton didn't know a single, damn thing about any of Assad's earlier gas attacks......Call it for what it is, Horseshit!

see also:
On Clinton's watch: Secret State Department cable on Syrian Gas Attack December 2012

Syrian Gas Attack Crisis ..... Obama's Foreign Policy Train Wreck

(originally posted 8.29.13)

Once more the vaunted Obama “calculus” proves wanting and this time dangerously so, as Syria's President slaughters his own people.

In the past decade the US has had ample opportunity to prevent Syria's use of gas weapons; especially on the Obama watch. The Obama position a year ago was that the use of chemical weapons by Syria’s President Assad was a “red line” the  incursion of which the US would not tolerate and threatened military reprisal  in response – since then according to British intelligence Assad has breached the line not just once but 14 times !

“Hey Buddy, You better listen to us Assad – no -  no, don’t do it, don’t do it – damn, well, we really mean it the next time!"

Middle East analysts have commented that when the United States embarks on military action in the region, Israel in turn suffers – this time, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz says, Netanyahu vows “forceful” retaliation if Israel determines that Syria will attack or moves to attack the Jewish State – though Israel has nukes “forceful” is not thought to mean their use, however, other commentators say while the probability of their “use is low it is not zero.”.

Reports from Iran’s news agency FARS said that unnamed Syrian military sources have promised that if the West attacks Syria, Tel Aviv would be targeted, “Israel will also be set on fire!”. What is also generally believed is that Assad and Hezbollah have 100,000 rockets and missiles to rain down upon Israel.

Israel has called up its reservists in preparation for war.

Israeli citizens have lined up at distribution centers to receive gas masks.

Obama has used Turkey as a CIA operations base in which to train and supply anti-Assad forces in Syria. Turkey expects retaliation from Syria. Both have already exchanged fire earlier. Turkey’s shared border with Syria extends 560 miles and shelters ½ million anti-Assad refugees. Reuters news service reports that Turkey has mobilized specialized equipment and personnel to deal with chemical attacks to its borders with Syria. A spokesman for Turkey’s Disaster and Emergency Management Directorate said, "We have increased our measures significantly since last week, to be prepared particularly in case of a chemical attack,". 

Iran has stepped forward for the first time, according to the Wall Street Journal, with its own threat, "Any attack on Syria would burn down Israel," Iranian news media reported Maj. Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi, chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, as saying.

And then of course there are Syria’s other allies – Putin’s Russia, and China.

Russian diplomats have continually warned against military intervention by western powers throughout the crisis saying that the consequences of not doing so would be “dire”. The Times of India reports that Russia has dispatched some of its naval forces to the eastern Mediterranean to neutralize the US Naval presence already there.

China has stepped up its warning against military action saying the consequences would be “catastrophic”. The official Chinese news agency, Xinhua, adds that the US and its allies were rushing to conclusions about who may have used chemical weapons in Syria before UN inspectors had completed their investigation.  Both China and Russia are expected to “veto” any UN Security Council measures against Syria.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the inspectors could finish and leave as early as this Saturday, and implored “Let Peace have a chance”.

In the background, meanwhile, Obama had his administration officials puff up the prospects of US retaliation while he himself has remained relatively silent.

On Saturday and Sunday, U.S. officials leaked plans to media to fire cruise missiles at Syrian military installations as a warning to the Syrian government not to use its chemical weapons stockpiles again.

"Damnit Assad --- We really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really mean it this time !!"

And on Sunday, Sen. Bob Corker, who was briefed by administration officials twice over the weekend, said a U.S. "response is imminent" in Syria. "I think we will respond in a surgical way," he said. On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry appeared to lay groundwork for a 3 day U.S. military incursion as early as today.

The architect of Obama’s planned military adventure, HOWEVER, has grave misgivings about it all:

Chris Harmer, a senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War,  says too much faith is being put into the outcome of surgical strikes on Assad's forces with little discussion of what wider goals such attacks are supposed to achieve.

"Tactical actions in the absence of strategic objectives is usually pointless and often counterproductive. I never intended my analysis of a cruise missile strike option to be advocacy even though some people took it as that."

A polite way of saying that the Obama Administration doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing.

But that’s never been an obstacle to Obama before – he’s always been content to make wrong-headed political decisions when the circumstances required thoughtful, comprehensive strategic ones.

"I made it clear that this is a low cost option”, Harmer said,  “but the broader issue is that low cost options don't do any good unless they are tied to strategic priorities and objectives." . He added, "Any ship officer can launch 30 or 40 Tomahawks. It's not difficult. The difficulty is explaining to strategic planners how this advances U.S. interests." 

"Punitive action is the dumbest of all actions," he said. "The Assad regime has shown an incredible capacity to endure pain and I don't think we have the stomach to deploy enough punitive action that would serve as a deterrent."

He also doubted the effectiveness of taking out Assad's chemical weapons capabilities. "If we start picking off chemical weapons targets in Syria, the logical response is if any weapons are left in the warehouses, he's going to start dispersing them among his forces if he hasn't already," he continued. "So you're too late to the fight."

Now in the face of opposition from America’s adversaries and from criticism at home by moving without Congressional authority or the UN support, which support Obama’s has previously said was essential in matters of international security;  he has spoken out and said in essence “Hey, wait a minute, that’s all premature, no decision has been reached as yet.”

It’s clear no one was speaking on any of this previously without Obama’s stamp of approval. Wonder how Kerry and Corker feel about another politically motivated reversal from Obama right about now and their credibility ?

If Obama decides to move ahead with military action there are as yet other deficiencies in that Obama expects Syria’s Assad and his allies will get the nuances of the message Obama wants to convey.

This is an attack to show my displeasure with you for having ignored my threats not because I’m trying to topple you from power (even though both of us know I really am trying to do that through proxies or why else would I be supporting secretly from Turkey the CIA operations to arm and train the opposition forces fighting against your regime ?).

"We are not focused on taking action to determine the outcome of the civil war," said a senior Obama administration official. "We intend to send a message to the world that this is not business as usual."

In other words, "hey, these are just cruise missiles to punish you, please don’t mistake them for cruise missiles to remove you from power.".

Jay Carney, spokesman for Obama, has said there must be a negotiated settlement with Assad to end Syria’s civil war; even though the recent gas attack makes that more unobtainable.

So …. Let me get this straight. According to the Obama administration Assad and his government are barbaric. They have committed a crime against humanity by deploying gas weapons against their own people.  However, Assad must remain in power in order for the Obama administration to negotiate a settlement to end Syria's civil conflict. But THEN Assad must go. Assad will understand the nuances of the Obama message in a military attack. And THEN Assad will enter into negotiations in which he will THEN surrender himself up to an international tribunal in the Hague to be tried as a war criminal. And because it was just a surgical strike there will be no unmanageable repercussions anywhere. Is that about it?

What I think will fly back to the White House in turn through diplomatic channels, of course, will be something in Arabic that sounds a lot like, …… Kiss My Ass !!!

With Obama calling the shots anyone care to hazard a guess as to the odds all of this will end well for Syria and the rest of the world ?

see also:

Obama, Benghazi, Al Qaeda, CIA, Syria, Turkey, Israel, Iran and Russia ......what if ?

Obama .... Can't decide - Syria or the Congo?

Does Obama Project US Weakness Abroad ... Straight from the horse's mouth.

“Obama Bin Laden’s” gun walking scheme …. Bob Schieffer got it right ?

Obama’s Foreign Policy Train Wreck …. Syrian Gas Attack Crisis

Once more the vaunted Obama “calculus” proves wanting and this time dangerously so, as Syria's President slaughters his own people.

In the past decade the US has had ample opportunity to prevent Syria's use of gas weapons; especially on the Obama watch. The Obama position a year ago was that the use of chemical weapons by Syria’s President Assad was a “red line” the  incursion of which the US would not tolerate and threatened military reprisal  in response – since then according to British intelligence Assad has breached the line not just once but 14 times !

“Hey Buddy, You better listen to us Assad – no -  no, don’t do it, don’t do it – damn, well, we really mean it the next time!"

Middle East analysts have commented that when the United States embarks on military action in the region, Israel in turn suffers – this time, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz says, Netanyahu vows “forceful” retaliation if Israel determines that Syria will attack or moves to attack the Jewish State – though Israel has nukes “forceful” is not thought to mean their use, however, other commentators say while the probability of their “use is low it is not zero.”.

Reports from Iran’s news agency FARS said that unnamed Syrian military sources have promised that if the West attacks Syria, Tel Aviv would be targeted, “Israel will also be set on fire!”. What is also generally believed is that Assad and Hezbollah have 100,000 rockets and missiles to rain down upon Israel.

Israel has called up its reservists in preparation for war.

Israeli citizens have lined up at distribution centers to receive gas masks.

Obama has used Turkey as a CIA operations base in which to train and supply anti-Assad forces in Syria. Turkey expects retaliation from Syria. Both have already exchanged fire earlier. Turkey’s shared border with Syria extends 560 miles and shelters ½ million anti-Assad refugees. Reuters news service reports that Turkey has mobilized specialized equipment and personnel to deal with chemical attacks to its borders with Syria. A spokesman for Turkey’s Disaster and Emergency Management Directorate said, "We have increased our measures significantly since last week, to be prepared particularly in case of a chemical attack,". 

Iran has stepped forward for the first time, according to the Wall Street Journal, with its own threat, "Any attack on Syria would burn down Israel," Iranian news media reported Maj. Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi, chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, as saying.

And then of course there are Syria’s other allies – Putin’s Russia, and China.

Russian diplomats have continually warned against military intervention by western powers throughout the crisis saying that the consequences of not doing so would be “dire”. The Times of India reports that Russia has dispatched some of its naval forces to the eastern Mediterranean to neutralize the US Naval presence already there.

China has stepped up its warning against military action saying the consequences would be “catastrophic”. The official Chinese news agency, Xinhua, adds that the US and its allies were rushing to conclusions about who may have used chemical weapons in Syria before UN inspectors had completed their investigation.  Both China and Russia are expected to “veto” any UN Security Council measures against Syria.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the inspectors could finish and leave as early as this Saturday, and implored “Let Peace have a chance”.

In the background, meanwhile, Obama had his administration officials puff up the prospects of US retaliation while he himself has remained relatively silent.

On Saturday and Sunday, U.S. officials leaked plans to media to fire cruise missiles at Syrian military installations as a warning to the Syrian government not to use its chemical weapons stockpiles again.

"Damnit Assad --- We really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really mean it this time !!"

And on Sunday, Sen. Bob Corker, who was briefed by administration officials twice over the weekend, said a U.S. "response is imminent" in Syria. "I think we will respond in a surgical way," he said. On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry appeared to lay groundwork for a 3 day U.S. military incursion as early as today.

The architect of Obama’s planned military adventure, HOWEVER, has grave misgivings about it all:

Chris Harmer, a senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War,  says too much faith is being put into the outcome of surgical strikes on Assad's forces with little discussion of what wider goals such attacks are supposed to achieve.

"Tactical actions in the absence of strategic objectives is usually pointless and often counterproductive. I never intended my analysis of a cruise missile strike option to be advocacy even though some people took it as that."

A polite way of saying that the Obama Administration doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing.

But that’s never been an obstacle to Obama before – he’s always been content to make wrong-headed political decisions when the circumstances required thoughtful, comprehensive strategic ones.

"I made it clear that this is a low cost option”, Harmer said,  “but the broader issue is that low cost options don't do any good unless they are tied to strategic priorities and objectives." . He added, "Any ship officer can launch 30 or 40 Tomahawks. It's not difficult. The difficulty is explaining to strategic planners how this advances U.S. interests." 

"Punitive action is the dumbest of all actions," he said. "The Assad regime has shown an incredible capacity to endure pain and I don't think we have the stomach to deploy enough punitive action that would serve as a deterrent."

He also doubted the effectiveness of taking out Assad's chemical weapons capabilities. "If we start picking off chemical weapons targets in Syria, the logical response is if any weapons are left in the warehouses, he's going to start dispersing them among his forces if he hasn't already," he continued. "So you're too late to the fight."

Now in the face of opposition from America’s adversaries and from criticism at home by moving without Congressional authority or the UN support, which support Obama’s has previously said was essential in matters of international security;  he has spoken out and said in essence “Hey, wait a minute, that’s all premature, no decision has been reached as yet.”

It’s clear no one was speaking on any of this previously without Obama’s stamp of approval. Wonder how Kerry and Corker feel about another politically motivated reversal from Obama right about now and their credibility ?

If Obama decides to move ahead with military action there are as yet other deficiencies in that Obama expects Syria’s Assad and his allies will get the nuances of the message Obama wants to convey.

This is an attack to show my displeasure with you for having ignored my threats not because I’m trying to topple you from power (even though both of us know I really am trying to do that through proxies or why else would I be supporting secretly from Turkey the CIA operations to arm and train the opposition forces fighting against your regime ?).

"We are not focused on taking action to determine the outcome of the civil war," said a senior Obama administration official. "We intend to send a message to the world that this is not business as usual."

In other words, "hey, these are just cruise missiles to punish you, please don’t mistake them for cruise missiles to remove you from power.".

Jay Carney, spokesman for Obama, has said there must be a negotiated settlement with Assad to end Syria’s civil war; even though the recent gas attack makes that more unobtainable.

So …. Let me get this straight. According to the Obama administration Assad and his government are barbaric. They have committed a crime against humanity by deploying gas weapons against their own people.  However, Assad must remain in power in order for the Obama administration to negotiate a settlement to end Syria's civil conflict. But THEN Assad must go. Assad will understand the nuances of the Obama message in a military attack. And THEN Assad will enter into negotiations in which he will THEN surrender himself up to an international tribunal in the Hague to be tried as a war criminal. And because it was just a surgical strike there will be no unmanageable repercussions anywhere. Is that about it?

What I think will fly back to the White House in turn through diplomatic channels, of course, will be something in Arabic that sounds a lot like, …… Kiss My Ass !!!

With Obama calling the shots anyone care to hazard a guess as to the odds all of this will end well for Syria and the rest of the world ?

see also:

Obama, Benghazi, Al Qaeda, CIA, Syria, Turkey, Israel, Iran and Russia ......what if ?

Obama .... Can't decide - Syria or the Congo?

Does Obama Project US Weakness Abroad ... Straight from the horse's mouth.

“Obama Bin Laden’s” gun walking scheme …. Bob Schieffer got it right ?

Obama, Profligate Liar ! .....

A prominent Washington politician dies and stands before St. Peter. While awaiting judgment he sees a staggering number of wall clocks; each with a name. His own shows the hands at quarter to 11:00.

The politician asks St. Peter what the clocks are about and St. Peter says, “They’re called “Liar’s Clocks” and each person has one. We use them”, he explains, “to help decide whether a person goes to Hell or Heaven.”.

“How much the hands advance is determined by how frequently you lied and how significant the lies were. That’s Mother Teresa’s clock and the hands have never moved. Yours on the other hand is about typical for a politician.”

Curious, the politician says, “I don’t see Obama’s clock, where’s his?”
“Oh, that one,” says St. Peter, “is in another office. Jesus is using it as a ceiling fan!”.

Amid fresh accusations that his recent speech (insert issue, controversy or scandal of your choice here ... Syria's Red Line, Benghazi Coverup, Immigration Reform, Obamacare, Israeli Security, Iranian Negotiations, Pakistan Corruption, George Bush, Solyndra, Appalachian Coal, Political Payoffs, EPA, Fast n' Furious, Mitt Romney, Susan Rice, Keystone Pipeline, Bin Laden Raid, Drone Assassination Program, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, PayGo, Hurricane Sandy Recovery, 2nd Amendment Rights, IRS Targeting, BP Gulf Recovery, Guantanamo, Immigration Reform, Transparency in Government, Socialist Ideology, Bipartisanship, Federal Budget 4 Trillion Deficit Reduction, NSA Eavesdropping, CIA Rendition and Torture, Libya, Egypt, Palestine, Constitutional Authority, Economic Recovery, SEIU, Bill Clinton, Foreign Policy, Islam, Foreign Intelligence Court, Sequester, Financial System Taxpayer Recoveries, Planned Parenthood, Earmarks and Lobbying, Government Shutdown, Indonesia, Abortion, ACORN,  etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. ) was full of distortions and outright lies, Obama supporters deny that the speech was cynical demagoguery.

Liberals have really gotten creative of late, twisting themselves into rhetorical and intellectual pretzels in their efforts to downplay and dismiss Obama’s monumental penchant for deception and lying.

But Obama himself shows what a load of BS their explanations are. The unvarnished truth is and has been, Obama lies by design and for effect !

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different stripes project their own views. As such, I am bound to disappoint some, if, not all of them.” – The Economist, Aug 23rd 2008

Yeah, right...of course, it's their fault anyway !!! ... No really, we understand, you couldn’t have possibly said anything that would have appealed to, or falsely encouraged their expectations.

Obama, Pelosi, and Reid Don't Get It .... Or Worse, They Really Don't Care !

In a CNBC interview on Tuesday, Kenneth Langone, Home Depot founder tried to explain how Obama's plans for deficit reduction and "investment" (spending) for the future amounted to "generational theft of an enormous magnitude". 

"The fundamentals haven't changed", Langone said. "And we don't know when the storm is going to hit." ... "It has to happen. If you look at our debt to GDP, eventually you reach a point where there's no turning back."

Langone had to resort to a simplistic analogy for the tribe of ever-slow-on-the-uptake interviewers at Squawk Box.

"If you had one meal left, and you had your grandchild with you, would you eat it or give it to your grandchild?" 

He said all people would say "give it to my grandchild."

Following Obama's dream, he argued, "[Is] eating the grandchildren's breakfast, lunch and dinner right now. And the [grandchildren] haven't been born yet."

It's not that Obama, Reid and Pelosi don't get it .... in point of fact, they do - what's so detestable and insidious is that they really don't care how devastating economic collapse is for everyone else; not only because they personally expect to be insulated but because the economic self-implosion of the United States must occur in order for their moronic left-wing, liberal ideology to become institutionalized.

Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize …. Thorbjorn Jagland’s Ambitions

In a 2011 CNN interview, Thorbjorn Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee was asked, “Has President Obama lived up to his Nobel Peace prize?”.

Jagland’s reply was,  “I think so. I’m as convinced as I was when he got it that he deserved it for many reasons.”

Apparently, White House staff never brought the interview to Obama’s attention, or maybe they did, and Obama thought the nominating process and the prize was all a big joke anyway !

On January 27^th, 2013 he sent a pre-recorded video message congratulating Henry Kissinger as the honoree at the ultra-exclusive Alfalfa Club dinner in Washington DC, joking how both he and the former Secretary of State had many things in common, including their Nobel Peace prizes: Kissinger for negotiating an end to the Vietnam War; “and I won mine for. . . ”

Obama looked off camera. “What did I win mine for ?”

Well, Obama here’s what you didn’t win it for … continuation of the CIA’s torture and rendition programs, and your role in the armed conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria. 

And then there’s your personal “Kill List” and the drone assassination program that has resulted in the deaths of 700 plus bystander civilians including 179 innocent children in Pakistan and Yemen. Where also, at least 3 American citizens have been targeted and killed without any “due process” other than your own interpretation of their Constitutional rights to life. 

When asked if the decision to put the first American on the Kill List – and then kill him - was difficult, Obama said, “It was an easy one.”.

While the first 2 were implicated and most probably involved in terrorist activities, the third American, a 16 year old boy, a minor, killed 2 weeks after the first two in a separate drone attack, was not. 

He only had the misfortune of having had a parent on the Obama “Kill List” and who according to former press secretary Robert Gibbs in attempting to justify the boy’s death, said, “I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children. I don't think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist is the best way to go about doing your business.”

In other words, according to an incoherent Gibbs, the presumed sins of the father is justification enough to kill the son. 

Congress having pressed the White House for an explanation of the legal authority for its “007 License to Kill” mentality, has so far been re-buffed by the Obama administration.

Recently, too, the United Nations has opened an official inquiry into the legality of the Obama drone assassination program.

Obama, however, remains unfazed and is content to now “profile” his victims without ascertaining actual identity as was required in the earlier stages of the program. He gives the order, the trigger is pulled, an explosion ensues, maybe some terrorists are killed, maybe not, but the body count of innocent civilians and children is likely to rise. 

Why? Because the blast radius of a Predator Drone Hellfire missile's 20 pound explosive warhead is at least 50 meters. 

For those who can't relate to the metric system yet, or that amount of destruction, it is the equivalent of a 110 yard or 330 foot diameter circle - or - imagine 2 NFL football fields side by side - and anything living - terrorist, civilian or innocent child - within that area when the missile strikes has a very high probability of ending up dead ! 

Would Americans remain silent if they really understood how devastating and destructive the drone strikes were and the toll they exact on innocent lives in contrast to the surgical precision of a sniper's bullet destined for a single adversary ?

Is it any wonder then, why the Obama Administration wants to downplay the extent of "civilian collateral damage" resulting from the widespread area blast effects of its drone strikes ?

Yes, in war civilian casualties are unfortunate, but according to the designer of the drone assassination program, John Brennan, who's also Obama's nominee to run the CIA - "we're only whacking the bad guys (circa)"      

Yeah, right !

Unlike the early stages of the program where high level Al Qaida operatives were positively identified, Obama is content now to kill low level threats indiscriminately - no longer must the US Military absolutely ascertain identity, they merely "profile" targets on the ground - and mistakes take place with an all too frequent regularity and lack of accountability.

No word on whether Jagland sleeps well at night.

see also:

Pakistan Drones .... Blood on Obama's hands?  

Obama's Deadly Use of Drones .... UN opens War Crimes Inquiry  

What Harry Reid Thinks of Americans …. You Stink!  

Initiative Launched Today to Revoke Obama's Nobel Peace Prize 

Litigation Against US for Drone Strikes 

Court Case for Death of 16 Year Old Boy Killed in Obama Drone Strike